Dear friend;

Here is a problem statement concerning our public education crisis:

There are two characteristics which set the human apart: objective reasoning
and intellectual control of behavior. We build our material things from our
objective reasoning. Our cultures are built from our intellectual control of
our behavior. The method we use in our intellectual control of behavior is
to establish a set of behavioral rules (values, ethics, morals) which will
allow us to live together in harmony. We have named such a set of rules a
'culture'. Our traditional culture recognizes the true human dynamics: We
are restless and searching creatures, each with the potential of being saint
or sinner,  who must live within a delicate balance between containment (so
others can live as we) and fulfillment (so that life is worthwhile).

To develop our children into responsible citizens in our culture, we must
teach them our set of rules and their consequences, and demand proper
behavior. This portion of a child's education is traditionally supervised by
parents and enforced in the school. To enhance the child's ability to live
and thrive as an adult in raising its family, while contributing its share
to our society, we collectively hire experts in the education field to
provide the child with the required objective learning. Our tax supported
schools, therefore, have two and only two responsibilities: reinforcing the
individual child's behavior patterns by enforcing our culture's behavioral
rules and teaching the child objective (factual, useful) knowledge.

We now have a growing (and dominant) elitist movement in our country which
denies the need for man to abide by a set of behavioral rules and sees
public education as a means of establishing a new world political and
cultural socialist empire. Since it denies any set of cultural rules (by
accepting the behaviors of all cultures through multiculturalism), it must
of necessity deny the confining authority of religion and family. It also
rejects factual knowledge, backed by scientific evidence, which shows that
man is in fact an instinctive creature (one born with certain social
inclinations, sometimes objectionable) with intelligence, a verification of
the view held by our traditional culture. 

Since this socialist movement is anti-culture and grows from within, it may
be viewed as a form of cultural cancer. 

Our government bureaucracy, the media, the education system and the courts
are all in agreement with and are a part of this new movement. Their intent
is to use the  public (government) school as an indoctrination device to,
among other things, separate the children away from family and religion.
Since factual education provides a basis for individual thought and decision
making and the school's primary objective is cultural socialization, a
doctrine which denies individualism, it must also avoid objective education
as much as possible.  So this group of educators we hire to do a couple of
tasks for us, does exactly the opposite on both: It attempts to destroy our
current culture and substitutes the teaching of unfounded and experimental
psychological social dogma for actual knowledge. 

Our children become laboratory animals in a giant social experiment.

This entire SLIME (Socialist Liberal Imperialist Marxist Elitist) movement
is now backed by our government, and, if it succeeds, will be only the
second time in history that a government actually revolutionized itself.
Russia went from socialism to free enterprise from the top down with little
bloodshed. Their masses had been brain-washed into obedience. The
socialization of a free enterprise population may not be so easy.
Thankfully, our population is thoroughly mixed. With socialist living next
door to traditionalist, it tends to make civil war unlikely (much like the
situation in Ireland, possibly producing sporadic terrorism, but hopefully
not as severe as in Lebanon or Spain, with their more disastrous results).
This is in great contrast with most socialist takeovers which become quite
bloody. The socialist takeovers in Russia, China, Vietnam, and Cambodia all
murdered a large percentage of their population to gain control, with even
bloodier purges (mass murders) after the takeover to solidify the position
(very likely here as the new regime settles in). This wanton disregard of
the individual is evident in the SLIME willingness to sacrifice the lives of
generations of our children to gain control here. A study of the histories
of other socialist takeovers is quite frightening.

The general public as yet does not understand what is happening. The SLIME
media has been very effective in portraying the education protestors as
being hard-core right-wing religious fanatics seeking to bring the public
schools under religious domination, thus hiding the socialization of our
education from the public. The SLIME courts have been effective using the
separation of church and state as a ploy, often making decisions which
interpret the constitution in a bizarre fashion. The SLIME bureaucracy
manages to interpret every law made as being supportive of their cause. Even
our elected officials, the few who are well-meaning, are hood-winked by
their own bureaucratic employees. When questions arise about education, they
turn to SLIME education experts for advice, something akin to asking the fox
how the hen-house is getting along, then handing him the key to finish the job.

The Achilles heel of this treason is the public (government) education
system. The SLIME must maintain control to bring about a peaceful
revolution. If we can turn this thing around and get back to the enforcement
of behavior and the teaching of factual knowledge in our schools, we can
stop the SLIME growth. This can be either done by abolishing government
schools in favor of a voucher system or by insisting on a strict conduct and
curriculum in the government schools.

OUR PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM WILL BE OUR NEXT BIG DEBATE. The revolution from
England, the freeing of slaves, the defense against fascism in WWII and the
civil rights movement will collectively pale in comparison. It may very well
be the debate which either starts or avoids the second American civil war.
Our very freedom, which we have often been required to defend, is again in
jeopardy.

###end###

I offer two internet sites for information on this debate.
http://www.rtd.com/~grafpub/slime is a militant activist education reform
site which brings in both religious and scientific argument.

The other site   http://www.rtd.com/~grafpub    is aimed toward the
development of a culture based on scientific evidence (through a study of
genetics and evolution). Those of you who are religious don't need this
except as arguing material whenever a SLIME starts telling you your beliefs
are dogma. It proves that his movement is sheer dogma without reason or
basis, and is in gross error. For those of you who are not religious but do
believe in a value set for a culture, this site verifies your thoughts with
scientific evidence.

Comments and criticisms are always greatly appreciated.

The mailing list that brought you this message is maintained. The sites are
dynamic, being rewritten constantly as the result of reader's comments and
further research. If you do not wish to receive notices of changes to the
sites and brief essays on current events, e-mail your request to be removed
from the mailing list and we will honor your request. On the other hand, we
appreciate referrals, if you know someone who might be interested.

All federal senators and congressmen who have e-mail access are
automatically included in our mailing list.  To enter any other politician
on the list, send us his/her e-mail address. Be sure to label it as a
politician. We won't allow politicians to remove their addresses. They are
all going to hear from us.

John Stevenson, (520) 749-8415
3721 Via de la Luna
Tucson AZ 85749



